To Jim Walsh, Minneapolis Star/Tribune

HERE IS MY RESPONSE TO JIM WALSH ARTICLE Jim: You forgot to say that I could show you 300 or 400 examples of successful stories about internet marketing using the iNetGlobal products. You also forgot to say that iNetGlobal is NOT Steve Renner. And then you forgot to address the fact that I accused you of media bias with your ”Guilty ’til proven innocent” slant on the original ’story’. – Furthermore, you did not explain to Diane and me how it came to pass that you were so immediately “on the scene” for the February 23 raid. You also forgot to mention that Judge Frank strongly suggested that iNetGlobal’s attorney may be well advised to petition the court for a partial release of the seized funds to continue with the iNetGlobal operations. And then – you also forgot to mention that Steve Keough is on the record for trying to extort $500,000, or iNetGlobal will face the consequences. Also – did you mention — ?? Steve Keough was a disgruntled, fired, employee? –

Did you know, Jim Walsh, that the Steve Renner tax evasion case is legitimately under an appeal process? Did you know, Jim Walsh, that the Jurors who convicted Steve Renner of Tax Evasion were never allowed to learn that Steve Renner had, in fact, paid his taxes?? That evidence was not allowed to be brought into evidence.

Did you bother to mention this, Jim Walsh??

http://cheapclix.net/to-jim-walsh-minneapolis-startribune/